From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13411 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2012 00:35:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 13259 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Feb 2012 00:35:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,SUBJ_OBFU_PUNCT_FEW,SUBJ_OBFU_PUNCT_MANY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:34:32 +0000 From: "hstong at ca dot ibm.com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/52291] New: __sync_fetch_and_add and friends poorly specified for pointer types Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:37:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hstong at ca dot ibm.com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg01752.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52291 Bug #: 52291 Summary: __sync_fetch_and_add and friends poorly specified for pointer types Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: hstong@ca.ibm.com CC: michaelw@ca.ibm.com Host: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu Target: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu The documentation states, regarding the __sync_fetch_and_X builtins: These builtins perform the operation suggested by the name, and returns the value that had previously been in memory. That is, { tmp = *ptr; *ptr op= value; return tmp; } { tmp = *ptr; *ptr = ~(tmp & value); return tmp; } // nand For pointer types (which GCC accepts for these builtins) the "operation suggested by the name" leans toward pointer arithmetic; however, the pointer types are not suitable for these operations in C/C++.