public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug driver/52297] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm
@ 2012-02-17 14:56 danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-17 16:00 ` [Bug driver/52297] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (10 more replies)
0 siblings, 11 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-17 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52297
Bug #: 52297
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1
c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link,
-flto -fgnu-tm
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: danglin@gcc.gnu.org
Host: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
Target: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
Build: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/
-
flto -fgnu-tm -c -o c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.
dg/lto/trans-mem-1_0.c (timeout = 300)
spawn /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/ -flto -fgnu-tm
-
c -o c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-
1_0.c
PASS: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o assemble, -flto -fgnu-tm
Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/
-
flto -fgnu-tm -c -o c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.
dg/lto/trans-mem-1_1.c (timeout = 300)
spawn /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/ -flto -fgnu-tm
-
c -o c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1_1.c
PASS: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o assemble, -flto -fgnu-tm
Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/
c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o -flto -fgnu-tm -o
gcc-dg-lto-trans-mem-1-01.exe (timeout = 300)
spawn /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/
c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o -flto -fgnu-tm -o
gcc-dg-lto-trans-mem-1-01.exe
xgcc: error: libitm.spec: No such file or directory
compiler exited with status 1
output is:
xgcc: error: libitm.spec: No such file or directory
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link,
-flto -fgnu-tm
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o
execute -flto -fgnu-tm
Similar fails:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-2 c_lto_trans-mem-2_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-2_1.o link,
-flto -fgnu-tm
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-4 c_lto_trans-mem-4_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-4_1.o link,
-flto -fgnu-tm
-bash-3.2$ ./xgcc -B./ -v
Reading specs from ./specs
COLLECT_GCC=./xgcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=./lto-wrapper
Target: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --with-gnu-as --with-as=/opt/gnu64/bin/as
--with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --enable-shared --with-local-prefix=/opt/gnu64
--prefix=/opt/gnu64/gcc/gcc-4.7 --build=hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
--enable-threads=posix --disable-nls --with-gmp=/opt/gnu64/gcc/gmp
--with-libelf=/opt/gnu64 --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,fortran
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20120216 (experimental) [trunk revision 184311] (GCC)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/52297] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm
2012-02-17 14:56 [Bug driver/52297] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-17 16:00 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-02-20 12:20 ` [Bug testsuite/52297] [4.7 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2012-02-17 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52297
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-02-17
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot
| |gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-02-17 15:45:29 UTC ---
AFAICT this affects also most of (all?) the *-linux-* platforms,e.g.,
http://glutton.geoffk.org/HEAD/native-logsum/gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.log.gzip.
The failures appeared between revisions 184169 and 184177 (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2012-02/msg00077.html and
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2012-02/msg00071.html), likely revision
184174.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/52297] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm
2012-02-17 14:56 [Bug driver/52297] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-17 16:00 ` [Bug driver/52297] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2012-02-20 12:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-20 13:29 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-20 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52297
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa64-hp-hpux11.11,
| |x86_64-*-*
Component|driver |testsuite
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Summary|FAIL: |[4.7 Regression] FAIL:
|gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 |gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1
|c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto |c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto
|_trans-mem-1_1.o link, |_trans-mem-1_1.o link,
|-flto -fgnu-tm |-flto -fgnu-tm
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-20 12:15:08 UTC ---
Yes, I'm seeing this as well.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/52297] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm
2012-02-17 14:56 [Bug driver/52297] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-17 16:00 ` [Bug driver/52297] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-02-20 12:20 ` [Bug testsuite/52297] [4.7 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-20 13:29 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-02-21 10:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2012-02-20 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52297
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-02-20 13:22:36 UTC ---
The tests pass on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10, but not on
i686-pc-linux-gnu; so x86_64-*-* does not seem the right target descriptor.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/52297] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm
2012-02-17 14:56 [Bug driver/52297] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-20 13:29 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2012-02-21 10:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-22 10:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-21 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52297
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-21 10:13:57 UTC ---
That's (essentially) independent of the target, as it's a pure testsuite issue.
Tests that require linking with -litm should go in libitm/testsuite instead.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/52297] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm
2012-02-17 14:56 [Bug driver/52297] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-21 10:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-22 10:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-22 20:09 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-22 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52297
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
CC| |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |torvald at gcc dot gnu.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/52297] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm
2012-02-17 14:56 [Bug driver/52297] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-22 10:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-22 20:09 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-22 20:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-22 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52297
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-22 20:00:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> That's (essentially) independent of the target, as it's a pure testsuite issue.
> Tests that require linking with -litm should go in libitm/testsuite instead.
It shouldn't be linking with -litm. All the required dummy functions should be
in gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem.h.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/52297] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm
2012-02-17 14:56 [Bug driver/52297] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-22 20:09 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-22 20:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-22 21:03 ` aldyh at redhat dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-22 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52297
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-22 20:08:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > That's (essentially) independent of the target, as it's a pure testsuite issue.
> > Tests that require linking with -litm should go in libitm/testsuite instead.
>
> It shouldn't be linking with -litm. All the required dummy functions should be
> in gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem.h.
But -fgnu-tm during linking now results in libitm.spec being sourced in, so it
needs either a hack version thereof somewhere where it can find it through -B
options, or some other approach.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/52297] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm
2012-02-17 14:56 [Bug driver/52297] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-22 20:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-22 21:03 ` aldyh at redhat dot com
2012-02-23 17:58 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: aldyh at redhat dot com @ 2012-02-22 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52297
--- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com> 2012-02-22 20:20:34 UTC ---
On 02/22/12 14:08, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52297
>
> --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek<jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-22 20:08:46 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #5)
>> (In reply to comment #4)
>>> That's (essentially) independent of the target, as it's a pure testsuite issue.
>>> Tests that require linking with -litm should go in libitm/testsuite instead.
>>
>> It shouldn't be linking with -litm. All the required dummy functions should be
>> in gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem.h.
>
> But -fgnu-tm during linking now results in libitm.spec being sourced in, so it
> needs either a hack version thereof somewhere where it can find it through -B
> options, or some other approach.
>
This looks like a regression brought about by:
+2012-02-13 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
+
+ * gcc.c (LINK_COMMAND_SPEC): Deal with -fgnu-tm.
+ (GTM_SELF_SPECS): Define if not already defined.
+ (driver_self_specs): Add GTM_SELF_SPECS.
+ * config/darwin.h (LINK_COMMAND_SPEC_A): Deal with -fgnu-tm.
+ (GTM_SELF_SPECS): Define.
+ * config/i386/cygwin.h (GTM_SELF_SPECS): Likewise.
+ * config/i386/mingw32.h (GTM_SELF_SPECS): Likewise.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/52297] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm
2012-02-17 14:56 [Bug driver/52297] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-22 21:03 ` aldyh at redhat dot com
@ 2012-02-23 17:58 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-29 10:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-29 10:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-23 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52297
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-23 17:54:26 UTC ---
> This looks like a regression brought about by:
>
> +2012-02-13 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
> +
> + * gcc.c (LINK_COMMAND_SPEC): Deal with -fgnu-tm.
> + (GTM_SELF_SPECS): Define if not already defined.
> + (driver_self_specs): Add GTM_SELF_SPECS.
> + * config/darwin.h (LINK_COMMAND_SPEC_A): Deal with -fgnu-tm.
> + (GTM_SELF_SPECS): Define.
> + * config/i386/cygwin.h (GTM_SELF_SPECS): Likewise.
> + * config/i386/mingw32.h (GTM_SELF_SPECS): Likewise.
Well, the existing linking scheme was totally broken, which allowed you to
devise the gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem.h hack. Now that it has been fixed, the hack
doesn't work anymore, which isn't very surprising... We need a proper fix
instead.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/52297] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm
2012-02-17 14:56 [Bug driver/52297] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-23 17:58 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-29 10:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-29 10:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-29 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52297
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-29 10:06:16 UTC ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/52297] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm
2012-02-17 14:56 [Bug driver/52297] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-29 10:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-29 10:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-29 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52297
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-29 10:06:00 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 29 10:05:55 2012
New Revision: 184657
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184657
Log:
2012-02-29 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR testsuite/52297
* gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1_0.c: Remove.
* gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1_1.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-2_0.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-2_1.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-4_0.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-4_1.c: Likewise.
Removed:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1_0.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1_1.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-2_0.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-2_1.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-4_0.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-4_1.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-29 10:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-17 14:56 [Bug driver/52297] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-17 16:00 ` [Bug driver/52297] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-02-20 12:20 ` [Bug testsuite/52297] [4.7 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-20 13:29 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-02-21 10:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-22 10:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-22 20:09 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-22 20:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-22 21:03 ` aldyh at redhat dot com
2012-02-23 17:58 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-29 10:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-29 10:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).