public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/52315] New: [C++11] constexpr object of nested class
@ 2012-02-20 11:05 oleg.endo@t-online.de
2012-02-20 13:43 ` [Bug c++/52315] " daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: oleg.endo@t-online.de @ 2012-02-20 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52315
Bug #: 52315
Summary: [C++11] constexpr object of nested class
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: oleg.endo@t-online.de
I'm not sure whether this is valid/invalid C++11, but it seems a little weird.
The following works as expected:
struct B
{
constexpr B (unsigned v) noexcept : val (v) { }
constexpr unsigned value (void) const noexcept { return val; }
unsigned val;
};
struct A
{
int stuff[B (16).value ()];
};
But moving struct B inside of struct A ...
struct A
{
struct B
{
constexpr B (unsigned v) noexcept : val (v) { }
constexpr unsigned value (void) const noexcept { return val; }
unsigned val;
};
int stuff[ B (16).value () ];
};
... results in error: size of array 'stuff' is not an integral
constant-expression
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=sh-elf-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/libexec/gcc/sh-elf/4.7.0/lto-wrapper
Target: sh-elf
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --target=sh-elf --prefix=/usr/local
--enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-multilib --disable-libssp --disable-nls
--disable-werror --enable-lto --with-newlib --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld
--with-system-zlib
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.7.0 20120220 (experimental) (GCC)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/52315] [C++11] constexpr object of nested class
2012-02-20 11:05 [Bug c++/52315] New: [C++11] constexpr object of nested class oleg.endo@t-online.de
@ 2012-02-20 13:43 ` daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2012-02-20 15:08 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com @ 2012-02-20 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52315
Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |daniel.kruegler at
| |googlemail dot com
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> 2012-02-20 13:27:46 UTC ---
The code looks ok to me: A::B is considered complete after the "};".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/52315] [C++11] constexpr object of nested class
2012-02-20 11:05 [Bug c++/52315] New: [C++11] constexpr object of nested class oleg.endo@t-online.de
2012-02-20 13:43 ` [Bug c++/52315] " daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
@ 2012-02-20 15:08 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-20 23:00 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-20 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52315
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-02-20
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-20 14:53:36 UTC ---
I can't see any reason it's not valid either, but I note that clang has exactly
the same behaviour. Let's ask Jason.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/52315] [C++11] constexpr object of nested class
2012-02-20 11:05 [Bug c++/52315] New: [C++11] constexpr object of nested class oleg.endo@t-online.de
2012-02-20 13:43 ` [Bug c++/52315] " daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2012-02-20 15:08 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-20 23:00 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-20 23:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-13 11:30 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-20 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52315
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-20 22:44:01 UTC ---
3.3.7: 1) The potential scope of a name declared in a class consists not only
of the declarative region following the name’s point of declaration, but also
of all function bodies, brace-or-equal-initializers of non-static data members,
and default arguments in that class (including such things in nested classes).
So within B::value, A::stuff is in scope, so we need to wait until A is
complete to parse B::value, so B::value can't be used in constant expressions
in A.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/52315] [C++11] constexpr object of nested class
2012-02-20 11:05 [Bug c++/52315] New: [C++11] constexpr object of nested class oleg.endo@t-online.de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-20 23:00 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-20 23:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-13 11:30 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-20 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52315
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-20 22:59:43 UTC ---
Shouldn't testcases like this be added to the testsuite anyway, with the
expected error?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/52315] [C++11] constexpr object of nested class
2012-02-20 11:05 [Bug c++/52315] New: [C++11] constexpr object of nested class oleg.endo@t-online.de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-20 23:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-03-13 11:30 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2012-03-13 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52315
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |trashyankes at wp dot pl
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-03-13 11:30:29 UTC ---
*** Bug 52366 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-13 11:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-20 11:05 [Bug c++/52315] New: [C++11] constexpr object of nested class oleg.endo@t-online.de
2012-02-20 13:43 ` [Bug c++/52315] " daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2012-02-20 15:08 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-20 23:00 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-20 23:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-13 11:30 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).