From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16541 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2012 16:45:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 16528 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Feb 2012 16:45:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:45:15 +0000 From: "ai.azuma at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/52374] New: [C++11] Fails to transform id-expression into dependent base member access in lambda expression Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:50:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ai.azuma at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg02423.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52374 Bug #: 52374 Summary: [C++11] Fails to transform id-expression into dependent base member access in lambda expression Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: ai.azuma@gmail.com Created attachment 26742 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26742 Output of -v option and preprocessed file In the lambda expression's compound statement, id-expressions referring to non-static members should be transformed into class member access expressions by prefixing `(*this).'. However, GCC fails the transformation when id-expressions involved are qualified-ids and refer to dependent base members. A test case is as follows; //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// struct B { int get() const { return 42; } }; template struct D : public X { int get() const { return [this]() -> int { return X::get(); }(); } }; int main() { D d; d.get(); } //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// For the above mentioned well-formed code, 4.7.0 20120218 (experimental) with -std=c++11 complains as follows; main.cpp: In instantiation of 'D::get() const [with X = B]::': main.cpp:10:29: required from 'struct D::get() const [with X = B]::' main.cpp:10:65: required from 'int D::get() const [with X = B]' main.cpp:16:9: required from here main.cpp:10:60: error: cannot call member function 'int B::get() const' without object `X::get' in the lambda expression should be implicitly transformed into `(*this).X::get', and the test case should compile successfully.