From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12887 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2012 14:13:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 12870 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Feb 2012 14:13:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:13:30 +0000 From: "amacleod at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug web/52382] Atomic builtins documentation, page not found Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:14:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: web X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: amacleod at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg02581.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52382 Andrew Macleod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod 2012-02-27 14:12:57 UTC --- Wonder why the names changed? I didn't actually add that link. I would think the sync legacy page ought to have the same name it use to (ie, rename the texinfo node, which I have no idea how to do) because who knows how many links to that are floating around. The new atomics didnt exist before now, so there shouldn't be many links to them... Id be tempted to just use the current name since I presume it was changed for a reason... I'm guessing bkoz knows how or why the names are different now? Or maybe there wasn't a good reason for the texinfo node name change.