public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/52382] New: Atomic builtins documentation, page not found
@ 2012-02-25 17:34 mib.bugzilla at gmail dot com
  2012-02-25 17:37 ` [Bug web/52382] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: mib.bugzilla at gmail dot com @ 2012-02-25 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52382

             Bug #: 52382
           Summary: Atomic builtins documentation, page not found
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: mib.bugzilla@gmail.com


The link below is referred to from a couple of pages (e.g.
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Atomic#Status), but it's "not found"

http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Atomic-Builtins.html#Atomic-Builtins


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/52382] Atomic builtins documentation, page not found
  2012-02-25 17:34 [Bug c/52382] New: Atomic builtins documentation, page not found mib.bugzilla at gmail dot com
@ 2012-02-25 17:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-02-25 18:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-25 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52382

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|c                           |web

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-25 17:33:52 UTC ---
Those were the docs for the __sync builtins, which have moved to:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fsync-Builtins.html

The docs for the new __atomic builtins are at 
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fatomic-Builtins.html

Maybe we should rename that page to preserve old links.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/52382] Atomic builtins documentation, page not found
  2012-02-25 17:34 [Bug c/52382] New: Atomic builtins documentation, page not found mib.bugzilla at gmail dot com
  2012-02-25 17:37 ` [Bug web/52382] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-25 18:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-02-25 20:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-25 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52382

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |amacleod at redhat dot com

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-25 17:37:04 UTC ---
Andrew, the wiki page could be easily fixed, but alternatively we could rename
the new page (i.e. the texinfo node) so old links still work, what do you
think?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/52382] Atomic builtins documentation, page not found
  2012-02-25 17:34 [Bug c/52382] New: Atomic builtins documentation, page not found mib.bugzilla at gmail dot com
  2012-02-25 17:37 ` [Bug web/52382] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-02-25 18:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-25 20:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-02-27  9:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-02-27 14:14 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-25 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52382

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-25 20:01:09 UTC ---
Note the wiki can be changed by anyone even without write access to GCC.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/52382] Atomic builtins documentation, page not found
  2012-02-25 17:34 [Bug c/52382] New: Atomic builtins documentation, page not found mib.bugzilla at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-02-25 20:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-27  9:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-02-27 14:14 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-27  9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52382

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-02-27
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/52382] Atomic builtins documentation, page not found
  2012-02-25 17:34 [Bug c/52382] New: Atomic builtins documentation, page not found mib.bugzilla at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-02-27  9:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-27 14:14 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: amacleod at redhat dot com @ 2012-02-27 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52382

Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com> 2012-02-27 14:12:57 UTC ---
Wonder why the names changed?  I didn't actually add that link.

I would think the sync legacy page ought to have the same name it use to (ie,
rename the texinfo node, which I have no idea how to do)  because who knows how
many links to that are floating around.

The new atomics didnt exist before now, so there shouldn't be many links to
them... Id be tempted to just use the current name since I presume it was
changed for a reason...    I'm guessing bkoz knows how or why the names are
different now?   Or maybe there wasn't a good reason for the texinfo node name
change.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-27 14:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-25 17:34 [Bug c/52382] New: Atomic builtins documentation, page not found mib.bugzilla at gmail dot com
2012-02-25 17:37 ` [Bug web/52382] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-25 18:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-25 20:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-27  9:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-27 14:14 ` amacleod at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).