public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/52395] [4.7 Regression] Too conservative alignment info from SRA
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:49:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-52395-4-G4FXvO9hPB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-52395-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52395

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW
            Summary|[4.7 Regression] Alignment  |[4.7 Regression] Too
                   |issue at O2                 |conservative alignment info
                   |                            |from SRA

--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-27 10:48:37 UTC ---
Confirmed at least.  The regression is because of a wrong-code fix.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-02-27 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-27  7:50 [Bug tree-optimization/52395] New: [4.7 Regression] Alignment issue at O2 izamyatin at gmail dot com
2012-02-27  9:40 ` [Bug tree-optimization/52395] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-27  9:51 ` izamyatin at gmail dot com
2012-02-27 10:00 ` izamyatin at gmail dot com
2012-02-27 10:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-27 10:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-27 10:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-27 10:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2012-02-27 13:52 ` [Bug tree-optimization/52395] [4.7 Regression] Too conservative alignment info from SRA rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-27 14:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-27 16:42 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-27 17:19 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-28  9:04 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2012-02-28  9:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-28  9:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-52395-4-G4FXvO9hPB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).