From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31875 invoked by alias); 29 Feb 2012 17:55:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 31852 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Feb 2012 17:55:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:54:56 +0000 From: "pcpa at mandriva dot com.br" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/52407] [4.6 Regression] sse2 simd uint32_t and int64_t and stack variable initialization Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:30:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pcpa at mandriva dot com.br X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.4 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg02845.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D52407 Paulo C=C3=A9sar Pereira de Andrade changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #9 from Paulo C=C3=A9sar Pereira de Andrade 2012-02-29 17:54:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Fixed on trunk. I'll backport it for 4.6.4 as it is latent on the branch= es. Thanks. I reported the problem because I thought it could hit somewhere else and I have some code that way, that was working since gcc 4.4, but the proper syntax to initialize the local variable should be, in the sample test case: vl_t w =3D {x,x}; what should make it easier for the compiler to understand what is being done.