From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-419265-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25241 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2013 12:08:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25181 invoked by uid 48); 4 Apr 2013 12:07:55 -0000
From: "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/52436] BIT_FIELD_REF <MEM_REF <>> should be canonicalized for non-bitfield accesses
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:08:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-52436-4-8Ad165RK6c@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-52436-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-52436-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00410.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52436

--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-04 12:07:53 UTC ---
For the rest of the discussion, see the thread starting here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00169.html

In particular, the folding should be done in gimple only (most likely
maybe_fold_reference) and test !is_gimple_reg().