From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-385170-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25605 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2012 14:50:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 25447 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Mar 2012 14:50:02 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:49:49 +0000
From: "crimaniak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/52458] [c++0x] compiler fails on for(:*this) with non-public inheritance with message: Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: crimaniak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-52458-4-gpRyn5IMYR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-52458-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-52458-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00223.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52458

--- Comment #5 from Alexey Kulentsov <crimaniak at gmail dot com> 2012-03-02 14:49:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)

>It works ok if you do the conversion to the base class explicitly:
 Yes, I just make public inheritance so this problem is non-blocking for me,
but this was a bug so I post it. It's pity MinGW updated only to 4.6.2.

> I think the range-for code needs to do overload resolution in the class' scope,
> but it fails to and tries to say the begin/end members are protected, then gets
> into trouble while trying to print the error message.

Agree. Diagnostics problem.