From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27369 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2014 17:55:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27317 invoked by uid 48); 20 Mar 2014 17:54:57 -0000 From: "jon at beniston dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/52466] C++ fails to build for --target=lm32-rtems4.11 (no exception model) Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jon at beniston dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg01891.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D52466 --- Comment #12 from Jon Beniston --- (In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #11) > This patch appears not to have been posted on gcc-patches which is requir= ed > for all checkins, and none of the bugzillas seem to say who approved it.= =20 Strange. I sent the patch to the mailing list. It's in my sent folder, but doesn't appear in the mailing list archive.=20 S=C3=A9bastien approved it, who I'd CCed on the mail. >>From gcc-bugs-return-447023-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Mar 20 18:48:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16980 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2014 18:48:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16936 invoked by uid 48); 20 Mar 2014 18:48:07 -0000 From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug lto/60567] lto1 ICE in add_symbol_to_partition, at lto/lto-partition.c:233 - when no -fresolution= is available Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 18:48:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: lto X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg01892.txt.bz2 Content-length: 937 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60567 Tobias Burnus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code Summary|lto1 ICE in |lto1 ICE in |add_symbol_to_partition, at |add_symbol_to_partition, at |lto/lto-partition.c:233 |lto/lto-partition.c:233 - | |when no -fresolution= is | |available --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus --- I finally found the crucial difference in the lto1 call: On openSUSE, I have a -fresolution=foo0.res in the call. If I remove it, lto1 ICEs. On the other hand, if I copy that file to gcc20, it compiles without ICEing.