public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug bootstrap/52509] New: target libstdc++-v3 should not be bootstrapped, libstdc++-v3 should also be a host_module (bootstrapped)
@ 2012-03-06 12:33 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-06 12:59 ` [Bug bootstrap/52509] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-03-06 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52509
Bug #: 52509
Summary: target libstdc++-v3 should not be bootstrapped,
libstdc++-v3 should also be a host_module
(bootstrapped)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: rguenth@gcc.gnu.org
We should not need to bootstrap the target libstdc++ (and it's multilibs),
but we only need a host libstdc++ (of the host multilib variant - does
a canadian cross even work right now with C++ bootstrap?). The host libstdc++
should be a static library only, and it should not build PCH files
(configured with --disable-libstdcxx-pch).
Thus, like simply
Index: Makefile.def
===================================================================
--- Makefile.def (revision 184981)
+++ Makefile.def (working copy)
@@ -84,6 +84,8 @@ host_modules= { module= libdecnumber; bo
host_modules= { module= libgui; };
host_modules= { module= libiberty; bootstrap=true;
extra_configure_flags='@extra_host_libiberty_configure_flags@';};
+host_modules= { module= libstdc++-v3; bootstrap=true;
+ extra_configure_flags='--disable-libstdcxx-pch';}
// We abuse missing to avoid installing anything for libiconv.
host_modules= { module= libiconv;
extra_configure_flags='--disable-shared';
@@ -113,7 +115,6 @@ host_modules= { module= lto-plugin; boot
extra_configure_flags=--enable-shared; };
target_modules = { module= libstdc++-v3;
- bootstrap=true;
lib_path=src/.libs;
raw_cxx=true; };
target_modules = { module= libmudflap; lib_path=.libs; };
?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/52509] target libstdc++-v3 should not be bootstrapped, libstdc++-v3 should also be a host_module (bootstrapped)
2012-03-06 12:33 [Bug bootstrap/52509] New: target libstdc++-v3 should not be bootstrapped, libstdc++-v3 should also be a host_module (bootstrapped) rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-03-06 12:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-06 13:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-06 13:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-03-06 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52509
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-06 12:58:35 UTC ---
Well, for profiledbootstrap I think it is nice if target-libstdc++-v3 is
actually bootstrapped, because then we are able to train the C++ FE on real C++
code.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/52509] target libstdc++-v3 should not be bootstrapped, libstdc++-v3 should also be a host_module (bootstrapped)
2012-03-06 12:33 [Bug bootstrap/52509] New: target libstdc++-v3 should not be bootstrapped, libstdc++-v3 should also be a host_module (bootstrapped) rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-06 12:59 ` [Bug bootstrap/52509] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-03-06 13:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-06 13:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-03-06 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52509
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-06 13:15:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Well, for profiledbootstrap I think it is nice if target-libstdc++-v3 is
> actually bootstrapped, because then we are able to train the C++ FE on real C++
> code.
Well, we bootstrap the host-libstdc++, that should be enough, no?
Bootstrapping libstdc++ multilib and with building the PCHs is excessive
waste of resources for building GCC with a C++ compiler.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/52509] target libstdc++-v3 should not be bootstrapped, libstdc++-v3 should also be a host_module (bootstrapped)
2012-03-06 12:33 [Bug bootstrap/52509] New: target libstdc++-v3 should not be bootstrapped, libstdc++-v3 should also be a host_module (bootstrapped) rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-06 12:59 ` [Bug bootstrap/52509] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-06 13:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-03-06 13:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-03-06 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52509
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-06 13:31:35 UTC ---
I guess bootstrapping of the host libstdc++-v3 if it is performed is fine.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-06 13:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-06 12:33 [Bug bootstrap/52509] New: target libstdc++-v3 should not be bootstrapped, libstdc++-v3 should also be a host_module (bootstrapped) rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-06 12:59 ` [Bug bootstrap/52509] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-06 13:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-06 13:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).