From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31308 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2012 18:46:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 31299 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jun 2012 18:46:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:46:11 +0000 From: "kaladhorn at me dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/52531] [OOP] Compilation fails with polymorphic dummy argument and OpenMP Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:46:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openmp, rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: kaladhorn at me dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00478.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52531 --- Comment #4 from kaladhorn at me dot com 2012-06-08 18:46:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Out of curiosity, would there be a technical issue in this case? > > It sure seemed natural to me. > > AFAICS there should not be any huge issues. One might consider to implement > this as an extension. If it does not hurt, I think it would be a good thing. As far as I am concerned, I engineered around it, as it is really an edge case we do not want to rely on. It arguably makes some code uglier, though.