From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31267 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2012 10:01:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 31248 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Mar 2012 10:01:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:01:09 +0000 From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/52540] std::use_facet throws bad_cast when compiled with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:12:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg01388.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52540 Paolo Carlini changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bkoz at redhat dot com --- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlini 2012-03-16 10:00:38 UTC --- To be clear: the way the thing is supposed to work, **only** basic_string should be special, because **only** the extern template for basic_string are guarded by "#if _GLIBCXX_EXTERN_TEMPLATE > 0" instead of "#if _GLIBCXX_EXTERN_TEMPLATE". If something special is happening elsewhere then it's an unintended bug. Now, if something got broken lately, like those sed, I have no idea, certainly I didn't change that. But, please post and discuss the issue and tentative fixes on the libstdc++ mailing list, not here. Benjamin, any idea about those sed?