From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32066 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2012 08:53:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 32017 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Mar 2012 08:53:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 08:52:57 +0000 From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/52569] [4.8 Regression] bootstrap fails on x86_64-apple-darwin10 at revision 185261 Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 08:53:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00969.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52569 --- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe 2012-03-13 08:52:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Mine. But I can only guess a fix and not test it. Basically we now absolutely > require the GTHREAD_ONCE stuff, please have a try providing it for darwin > (I can see a manual page for pthread_once at least). > > I see in unwind-dw2-fde-darwin.c: > > /* Carefully don't include gthr.h. */ > > what's that about? It looks like that hack no longer works with the > changed condition for using __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION. apologies, no time to look at this right now... .. is the content of this thread helpful? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg00211.html