public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ian at airs dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/52571] vectorizer changes alignment of common symbols
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:12:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-52571-4-019DqA1qNO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-52571-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571

--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> 2012-03-13 15:48:36 UTC ---
I agree: if the symbol is always common, the linker should use the largest
alignment.  But the symbol need not always be common.  Consider one file with
"unsigned long int *p;" and another file with "unsigned long int *p = &i;". 
That is a valid use of common symbols.  But now gcc might mark the common
symbol as having an alignment of 16, while leaving the definition with an
alignment of 8.  The rules of common symbol linking mean that the definition
will override the common symbol.  But the definition might have an alignment of
8, and it might not be possible for the linker to fix that--and in any case,
the linker won't even try.

In other words, common symbols are special.  You can't assume that anything you
change about them will stick, because they might become, in effect, an
undefined symbol.  I suspect that vect_can_force_dr_alignment_p should be
checking DECL_COMMON for exactly the reasons that it checks DECL_EXTERNAL.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-13 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-12 21:53 [Bug tree-optimization/52571] New: " ian at airs dot com
2012-03-12 22:10 ` [Bug tree-optimization/52571] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-13  8:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-13 17:12 ` ian at airs dot com [this message]
2012-03-14  9:39 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2012-03-14 13:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-14 13:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-16 16:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-20 15:33 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-20 15:57 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-03-20 16:03 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-04-09 23:54 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-10 11:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-10 12:15 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-10 16:11 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-52571-4-019DqA1qNO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).