From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-386566-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23387 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2012 15:17:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 23365 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Mar 2012 15:17:12 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:16:50 +0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/52614] [4.8 Regression] Test failures in gcc.dg/vect: vectorizing unaligned access
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:22:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed Ever Confirmed
Message-ID: <bug-52614-4-dDpOVGHoGV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-52614-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-52614-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg01619.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614

Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-03-20
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-03-20 15:16:45 UTC ---
> The tests reported in PR52603 are still failing on arm (last tested on trunk
> r185474).

When asked on IRC, Richard Guenther said he preferred a new PR rather than
reopening PR52603. He also asked me to test the addition of -fno-common to
DEFAULT_VECTCFLAGS in gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect.exp (patch in comment #0).
Could some of you test it on your favorite plaforms (it is enough to vect.exp
only)?