public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/52621] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with -O3 -march=opteron in initialize_matrix_A, at tree-data-ref.c:1964 Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:27:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-52621-4-bJ4L8zSfO6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-52621-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621 Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |spop at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-05 11:27:02 UTC --- evolution_function_is_univariate_p returns true for {(integer(kind=8)) {0, +, {2, +, 2}_2}_2, +, 1}_3 but that does not look univariate to me - we do not properly look into CHREC_LEFT which is (integer(kind=8)) {0, +, {2, +, 2}_2}_2, so something like @@ -1114,6 +1132,8 @@ evolution_function_is_univariate_p (cons break; default: + if (tree_contains_chrecs (CHREC_LEFT (chrec), NULL)) + return false; break; } @@ -1127,6 +1147,8 @@ evolution_function_is_univariate_p (cons break; default: + if (tree_contains_chrecs (CHREC_RIGHT (chrec), NULL)) + return false; break; } fixes this. Then we ICE the same way in analyze_miv_subscript because we think that beast is affine-multivariate. The above fix looks obvious to me, but what the right condition for failing in analyze_overlapping_iterations should be for "loop_nest" should be, and why using the loop number of the outermost loop of the nest should be sufficient is beyond my understanding. Sebastian, can you help? I can certainly amend /* If they aren't the same, and aren't affine, we can't do anything yet. */ else if ((chrec_contains_symbols (chrec_a) || chrec_contains_symbols (chrec_b)) && (!evolution_function_is_affine_multivariate_p (chrec_a, lnn) || !evolution_function_is_affine_multivariate_p (chrec_b, lnn))) { dependence_stats.num_subscript_undetermined++; *overlap_iterations_a = conflict_fn_not_known (); *overlap_iterations_b = conflict_fn_not_known (); } though it looks to me that this should go into the else part and the analyze_miv_subscript case lacks a proper test.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-05 11:27 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-03-19 16:13 [Bug fortran/52621] New: ICE when compiling Fortran77 code with optimization pepalogik at seznam dot cz 2012-03-19 16:17 ` [Bug fortran/52621] " pepalogik at seznam dot cz 2012-03-20 8:42 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21 12:45 ` pepalogik at seznam dot cz 2012-03-21 13:22 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-03-21 13:33 ` [Bug middle-end/52621] ICE with -O3 -march=opteron in initialize_matrix_A, at tree-data-ref.c:1964 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-21 13:52 ` [Bug middle-end/52621] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-03-21 14:21 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-03-21 14:27 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-04-05 10:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-05 11:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2012-04-11 12:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-11 14:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-11 14:21 ` [Bug middle-end/52621] [4.6/4.7 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-13 13:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-06 9:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-06 9:27 ` [Bug middle-end/52621] [4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-17 22:56 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-12 16:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-52621-4-bJ4L8zSfO6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).