From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-388438-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1383 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2012 12:18:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 1322 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Apr 2012 12:17:59 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:17:47 +0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/52621] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with -O3 -march=opteron in initialize_matrix_A, at tree-data-ref.c:1964
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.4
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-52621-4-fgfWcCq75O@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-52621-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-52621-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00720.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621

--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-11 12:17:12 UTC ---
evolution_function_is_invariant_rec_p returns true for
(integer(kind=8)) {0, +, {2, +, 2}_2}_2 and loop 1 even if loop 2 is nested
inside loop 1.  Thus,

@@ -1011,6 +1029,8 @@ evolution_function_is_invariant_rec_p (t
   if (TREE_CODE (chrec) == POLYNOMIAL_CHREC)
     {
       if (CHREC_VARIABLE (chrec) == (unsigned) loopnum
+         || flow_loop_nested_p (get_loop (loopnum),
+                                get_loop (CHREC_VARIABLE (chrec)))
          || !evolution_function_is_invariant_rec_p (CHREC_RIGHT (chrec),
                                                     loopnum)
          || !evolution_function_is_invariant_rec_p (CHREC_LEFT (chrec),

is required, IMHO, too.