From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-386645-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9839 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2012 10:45:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 9670 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Mar 2012 10:45:42 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:45:30 +0000
From: "marc.glisse at normalesup dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/52654] New: [C++11] Warn on overflow in user-defined literals
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:48:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-52654-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg01698.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52654

             Bug #: 52654
           Summary: [C++11] Warn on overflow in user-defined literals
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: marc.glisse@normalesup.org


Hello,

should there be a warning for this kind of overflow? (-Wall -Wextra is
currently silent)

int operator"" _w(unsigned long long){return 0;}
int main(){
  return 12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890_w;
}