From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-387072-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1400 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2012 17:14:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 1385 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Mar 2012 17:14:55 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,SUBJ_OBFU_PUNCT_FEW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:14:42 +0000
From: "daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/52702] New: [C++11] std::is_trivially_destructible is missing
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:44:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-52702-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg02125.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52702

             Bug #: 52702
           Summary: [C++11] std::is_trivially_destructible is missing
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.8.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com


gcc 4.8.0 20120318 (experimental) in C++11 mode rejects the following code:

//-----
#include <type_traits>

struct pod {};
struct non_pod { ~non_pod(); };

static_assert(std::is_trivially_destructible<pod>::value, "");
static_assert(std::is_trivially_destructible<int>::value, "");
static_assert(!std::is_trivially_destructible<non_pod>::value, "");
//-----

due to the missing definition of the is_trivially_destructible type trait.

This should not be much work, because the TR1 trait has_trivial_destructor does
exist and uses the __has_trivial_destructor intrinsic and is_destructible is
also provided.