From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19041 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2012 07:35:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 18892 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Mar 2012 07:35:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:35:42 +0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/52734] Incorrect optimization of uClibc sbrk() Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:43:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed Ever Confirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg02292.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52734 Richard Guenther changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed| |2012-03-27 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-27 07:35:27 UTC --- The testcase does not reproduce the issue for me on i?86-linux. Are you sure the testcase reproduces the issue for you? Can you attach the wrong assembly that is produced and the output of the compiler command producing it when you append -v to it?