From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-387766-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17414 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2012 23:01:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 17405 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Apr 2012 23:01:29 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Apr 2012 23:01:15 +0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/52823] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/renaming5.adb scan-tree-dump-times optimized "goto" 2
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 23:01:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution
Message-ID: <bug-52823-4-PEy2sCOboK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-52823-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-52823-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00048.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52823

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-01 23:00:07 UTC ---
> AFAICT the test passes at r185912 on s390-ibm-linux-gnu default (see
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg03204.html), but fails at
> r185969 (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg03354.html) as
> well as on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (see
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg03405.html).

It probably fails everywhere, this is known, no point in opening a PR for such
a benign regression during stage #1.

> Note that gnat.dg/return3.adb fails on s390-ibm-linux-gnu default and
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu:
> 
> FAIL: gnat.dg/return3.adb scan-assembler loc 1 6
> 
> I did not checked if a pr has already been filled for it or not. If not, since
> I don't see it on darwin, I'll let a linux user fill it.

Likewise, let's avoid cluttering up the database for this.