public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug regression/52834] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_tag_decl
@ 2012-04-02 13:18 doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-04-02 13:47 ` [Bug regression/52834] " markus at trippelsdorf dot de
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: doko at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-02 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52834

             Bug #: 52834
           Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_tag_decl
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: regression
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: doko@gcc.gnu.org


Created attachment 27068
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27068
preprocessed source

seen with the 4.7.0 release (x86_64-linux-gnu), works with 4.6.3

$ g++ -c -g ProcessDies.ii   In file included from
/usr/include/libsysactivity/global.h:56:0,
                 from /usr/include/libsysactivity/libsysactivity.h:122,
                 from
/home/packages/tmp/sentinella-0.9.0/src/Conditions/ProcessDies.h:24,
                 from
/home/packages/tmp/sentinella-0.9.0/src/Conditions/ProcessDies.cpp:21:
/usr/include/libsysactivity/process.h:40:1: internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00000000004fed50 in check_tag_decl(cp_decl_specifier_seq*) ()
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00000000004fed50 in check_tag_decl(cp_decl_specifier_seq*) ()
#1  0x000000000050f0e6 in shadow_tag(cp_decl_specifier_seq*) ()
#2  0x000000000056bfdd in ?? ()
#3  0x0000000000571238 in ?? ()
#4  0x000000000057547c in ?? ()
#5  0x0000000000574118 in ?? ()
#6  0x0000000000574458 in ?? ()
#7  0x00000000005754f8 in ?? ()
#8  0x0000000000574118 in ?? ()
#9  0x00000000005759e3 in c_parse_file() ()
#10 0x0000000000605c05 in c_common_parse_file() ()
#11 0x000000000086fae0 in toplev_main(int, char**) ()
#12 0x00007ffff5ddcead in __libc_start_main () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#13 0x00000000004e8181 in _start ()


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug regression/52834] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_tag_decl
  2012-04-02 13:18 [Bug regression/52834] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_tag_decl doko at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-04-02 13:47 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
  2012-04-02 16:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: markus at trippelsdorf dot de @ 2012-04-02 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52834

Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |markus at trippelsdorf dot
                   |                            |de

--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> 2012-04-02 13:47:30 UTC ---
Testcase:

__attribute__ ((visibility("default"))) enum foo{
  bar = 0 };

 % gcc -c test.ii
test.ii:2:11: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug regression/52834] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_tag_decl
  2012-04-02 13:18 [Bug regression/52834] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_tag_decl doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-04-02 13:47 ` [Bug regression/52834] " markus at trippelsdorf dot de
@ 2012-04-02 16:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-04-02 18:31 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
  2012-04-03 16:19 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-02 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52834

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-02 16:45:42 UTC ---
Dup of PR52671 ?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug regression/52834] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_tag_decl
  2012-04-02 13:18 [Bug regression/52834] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_tag_decl doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-04-02 13:47 ` [Bug regression/52834] " markus at trippelsdorf dot de
  2012-04-02 16:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-04-02 18:31 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
  2012-04-03 16:19 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: markus at trippelsdorf dot de @ 2012-04-02 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52834

--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> 2012-04-02 18:31:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Dup of PR52671 ?

Yes. Gcc-4.8 from today is fine. Gcc-4.7 release fails.
Haven't tried the gcc-4.7 branch, but it seems obvious.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug regression/52834] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_tag_decl
  2012-04-02 13:18 [Bug regression/52834] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_tag_decl doko at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-04-02 18:31 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
@ 2012-04-03 16:19 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: doko at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-03 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52834

Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-03 16:18:28 UTC ---
yes, works on the branch

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 52671 ***


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-03 16:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-04-02 13:18 [Bug regression/52834] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_tag_decl doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-02 13:47 ` [Bug regression/52834] " markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-04-02 16:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-02 18:31 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-04-03 16:19 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).