From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5434 invoked by alias); 2 Nov 2012 02:17:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 5380 invoked by uid 48); 2 Nov 2012 02:16:50 -0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/52839] [4.7/4.8 Regression] double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 02:17:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.1 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00105.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 --- Comment #37 from Andrew Pinski 2012-11-02 02:16:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #36) > The change I mention in #c22 > http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=184110 > tests for atomic ops on all of bool, short, int and long long, where the > previous test was for *either* atomic bool or atomic short. My fix for powerpc > removed the long long test. Does mips lack atomic on bool or short? No it does not lack atomic for either book or short. I am getting exactly the same failure as mentioned in #c3 and not the double free though.