public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "steffen-schmidt at siemens dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/52876] New: [x32] - Sign extend 32 to 64bit then clear upper 32bits fails O1 or higher
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 08:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-52876-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52876

             Bug #: 52876
           Summary: [x32] - Sign extend 32 to 64bit then clear upper
                    32bits fails O1 or higher
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: steffen-schmidt@siemens.com


Created attachment 27096
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27096
Example code v1

This function sign extends an x32 32bit void* into a 64bit long long global
variable. Afterwards it zeros upper 32bits using binary AND.

long long li;

long long testfunc(void* addr) __attribute__ ((noinline));
long long testfunc(void* addr)
{
  li = (long long)(int)addr;

  // next line is important, if the address from pv
  // has been sign extended with leading ONEs
  li &= 0xffffffff;

  return li;
}


int main (void)
{
    volatile long long rv_test;
    rv_test = testfunc((void*)0x87651234);

    return 0;
}

The following examples are called with parameter (void*)0x87651234

Compiled with gcc 4.7.0 -mx32 -O0 produces:
movq    %rdi, %rax
movl    %eax, -4(%rbp)
movl    -4(%rbp), %eax
cltq #sign extend EAX to RAX, e.g. 0x87651234 to 0xffffffff87651234
movq    %rax, li(%rip)
movq    li(%rip), %rax
andl    $4294967295, %eax  #the AND 0xffffffff, producing 0x0000000087651234
movq    %rax, li(%rip)
movq    li(%rip), %rax

Compiled with gcc 4.7.0 -mx32 -O1 produces:
movslq    %edi, %rax #this is only a sign extend producing 0xffffffff87651234
                   #the zero-ing of the upper 32bits is missing.
movq    %rax, li(%rip)

Compiled with gcc 4.6.3 (x32 branch) -mx32 -O1 produces:
movq    %rdi, %rax #Here the sign extend and the AND are combined to a mov
                   #the results in 0x0000000087651234 which is correct.
movq    %rdi, li(%rip)


It seems that somehow gcc 4.7.0 "forgets" to clear the upper bits, which gcc
4.6.3 branch x32 did correctly.
The effect only happens in a stand-alone function and using a global variable,
when inlining, the result is correct.

I've attached 3 versions of the test, all failing in O1 or higher.  The first
using a global variable, the second a union and a local variable, the third
using a variadic function.


             reply	other threads:[~2012-04-05  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-05  8:17 steffen-schmidt at siemens dot com [this message]
2012-04-05  8:19 ` [Bug target/52876] " steffen-schmidt at siemens dot com
2012-04-05  8:20 ` steffen-schmidt at siemens dot com
2012-04-05  8:20 ` steffen-schmidt at siemens dot com
2012-04-05  8:21 ` steffen-schmidt at siemens dot com
2012-04-05  8:21 ` steffen-schmidt at siemens dot com
2012-04-05 10:16 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2012-04-05 10:17 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2012-04-05 13:43 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-04-05 13:50 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-04-05 14:31 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-04-05 15:17 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/52876] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
2012-04-05 15:21 ` [Bug target/52876] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-04-05 15:46 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-04-10 14:50 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/52876] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-04-11 19:32 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-07 11:50 ` steffen-schmidt at siemens dot com
2013-02-07 16:34 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2024-03-26 23:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-52876-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).