public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "steffen-schmidt at siemens dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/52876] New: [x32] - Sign extend 32 to 64bit then clear upper 32bits fails O1 or higher Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 08:17:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-52876-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52876 Bug #: 52876 Summary: [x32] - Sign extend 32 to 64bit then clear upper 32bits fails O1 or higher Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: steffen-schmidt@siemens.com Created attachment 27096 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27096 Example code v1 This function sign extends an x32 32bit void* into a 64bit long long global variable. Afterwards it zeros upper 32bits using binary AND. long long li; long long testfunc(void* addr) __attribute__ ((noinline)); long long testfunc(void* addr) { li = (long long)(int)addr; // next line is important, if the address from pv // has been sign extended with leading ONEs li &= 0xffffffff; return li; } int main (void) { volatile long long rv_test; rv_test = testfunc((void*)0x87651234); return 0; } The following examples are called with parameter (void*)0x87651234 Compiled with gcc 4.7.0 -mx32 -O0 produces: movq %rdi, %rax movl %eax, -4(%rbp) movl -4(%rbp), %eax cltq #sign extend EAX to RAX, e.g. 0x87651234 to 0xffffffff87651234 movq %rax, li(%rip) movq li(%rip), %rax andl $4294967295, %eax #the AND 0xffffffff, producing 0x0000000087651234 movq %rax, li(%rip) movq li(%rip), %rax Compiled with gcc 4.7.0 -mx32 -O1 produces: movslq %edi, %rax #this is only a sign extend producing 0xffffffff87651234 #the zero-ing of the upper 32bits is missing. movq %rax, li(%rip) Compiled with gcc 4.6.3 (x32 branch) -mx32 -O1 produces: movq %rdi, %rax #Here the sign extend and the AND are combined to a mov #the results in 0x0000000087651234 which is correct. movq %rdi, li(%rip) It seems that somehow gcc 4.7.0 "forgets" to clear the upper bits, which gcc 4.6.3 branch x32 did correctly. The effect only happens in a stand-alone function and using a global variable, when inlining, the result is correct. I've attached 3 versions of the test, all failing in O1 or higher. The first using a global variable, the second a union and a local variable, the third using a variadic function.
next reply other threads:[~2012-04-05 8:17 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-04-05 8:17 steffen-schmidt at siemens dot com [this message] 2012-04-05 8:19 ` [Bug target/52876] " steffen-schmidt at siemens dot com 2012-04-05 8:20 ` steffen-schmidt at siemens dot com 2012-04-05 8:20 ` steffen-schmidt at siemens dot com 2012-04-05 8:21 ` steffen-schmidt at siemens dot com 2012-04-05 8:21 ` steffen-schmidt at siemens dot com 2012-04-05 10:16 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-04-05 10:17 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-04-05 13:43 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-04-05 13:50 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-04-05 14:31 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-04-05 15:17 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/52876] " ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-04-05 15:21 ` [Bug target/52876] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-04-05 15:46 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-04-10 14:50 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/52876] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-04-11 19:32 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-07 11:50 ` steffen-schmidt at siemens dot com 2013-02-07 16:34 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2024-03-26 23:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-52876-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).