From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2031 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2012 21:01:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 1972 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Apr 2012 21:01:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:00:13 +0000 From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/52878] [4.8 regression] bootstrap failure: "MASK_LONG_DOUBLE_128" redefined Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg01568.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52878 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-04-18 20:59:16 UTC --- > If someone can provide a description of what TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_128 > should be in all cases, I can try to come up with a patch. It should be: options.h:#define MASK_LONG_DOUBLE_128 (1 << 16) options.h:#define TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_128 ((target_flags & MASK_LONG_DOUBLE_128) != 0) on SPARC/Solaris, but of course the (1 << 16) is dependent on other options, so a patch that hardcodes it isn't acceptable, IOW this must be fixed in opth-gen.awk.