From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-388173-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31189 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2012 22:43:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 31175 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Apr 2012 22:43:28 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 22:43:16 +0000
From: "danglin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/52894] [4.5,4.6,4.7,4.8 Regression] Stage1 bootstrap fails with gcc-4.6.3: Infinite loop in pointer_set_insert
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 22:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-52894-4-SPZoEH6aF6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-52894-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-52894-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00455.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52894

--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-06 22:43:09 UTC ---
cc1 is stuck in this loop in insert_aux:

  while (true)
    {
      if (slots[n] == p || slots[n] == 0)
        return n;
      else
        {
          ++n;
          if (n == n_slots)
            n = 0;
        }
    }

Fails even when pointer-set.c is compiled at -O0.