From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24930 invoked by alias); 4 May 2012 12:52:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 24912 invoked by uid 22791); 4 May 2012 12:52:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,TW_SD,TW_VM,TW_VP,TW_ZJ X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 May 2012 12:51:54 +0000 From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/52908] xop-mul-1:f9 miscompiled on bulldozer (-mxop) Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 12:52:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00423.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52908 --- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2012-05-04 12:51:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > A Quick make check on i386.exp result is shown below: > > Tests that now fail, but worked before: > > gcc.target/i386/xop-imul32widen-vector.c scan-assembler vpmacsdql This is expected, there is no need to emit vpmacsdql, IMO vpmuldq works as good (if not even better, since we don't have to preload accumulator with zero). The test should be either changed to really emit vpmacsdql, or asm scan should be adjusted. > Tests that now work, but didn't before: > > gcc.target/i386/xop-mul-1.c execution test Yes this one should be fixed with the patch. If the change vmpacsdql -> vpmuldq is OK with you, I can commit the patch, but I'd ask you for full bootstrap/regression test.