public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/52934] New: enhancement: cshift0 should be inlined
@ 2012-04-11 12:45 matz at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-04-11 12:51 ` [Bug fortran/52934] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: matz at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-11 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52934

             Bug #: 52934
           Summary: enhancement: cshift0 should be inlined
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.8.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: matz@gcc.gnu.org


polyhedrons protein would improve quite a bit when the cshift0 intrinsic
would be inlined.  With the patch below on my machine the runtime for
protein drops from 0m21.367s to 0m19.227s (i.e. by 10%).  Inlining a generic
cshift probably wouldn't bring the same improvement, but still.

(a bit related is my patch to improve cshift0 at 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg00533.html )

--- protein.f90.mm      2011-12-02 16:22:47.000000000 +0100
+++ protein.f90 2011-12-02 16:16:38.000000000 +0100
@@ -250,7 +250,20 @@ out3:         do n1 = 1, polypeptide_len
 !
               total_surface_energy = 0
               true_total_surface_energy = 0.0_LONGreal
-              shifted_surface_sequence = cshift(surface_sequence(:,l),m-1)
+              if (m == 1) then
+                shifted_surface_sequence = surface_sequence(:,l)
+              else if (m == 2) then
+                shifted_surface_sequence(1:3) = surface_sequence(2:4,l)
+                shifted_surface_sequence(4) = surface_sequence(1,l)
+              else if (m == 3) then
+                shifted_surface_sequence(1:2) = surface_sequence(3:4,l)
+                shifted_surface_sequence(3:4) = surface_sequence(1:2,l)
+              else if (m == 4) then
+                shifted_surface_sequence(1) = surface_sequence(4,l)
+                shifted_surface_sequence(2:4) = surface_sequence(1:3,l)
+              else
+                shifted_surface_sequence = cshift(surface_sequence(:,l),m-1)
+              end if
               do k = 1, number_of_polypeptides
                   surface_energy = 0
                   true_surface_energy = 0.0_LONGreal


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/52934] enhancement: cshift0 should be inlined
  2012-04-11 12:45 [Bug fortran/52934] New: enhancement: cshift0 should be inlined matz at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-04-11 12:51 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-11 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52934

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-11 12:51:34 UTC ---
Seems to be the same as PR 52473 -> mark as duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 52473 ***


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-11 12:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-04-11 12:45 [Bug fortran/52934] New: enhancement: cshift0 should be inlined matz at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-11 12:51 ` [Bug fortran/52934] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).