public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/52953] function parameter name redeclarations not detected Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 18:28:20 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-52953-4-AXgc1Dw620@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-52953-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52953 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Created attachment 55820 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55820&action=edit gcc14-pr52953-2.patch Untested incremental patch to diagnose even extern redeclarations in the https://eel.is/c++draft/basic.scope#block-2 case. I'm not convinced this second part is correct though and there seems to be high implementation variance (g++ vs. clang++ vs. ICC vs. MSVC). Because https://eel.is/c++draft/basic.scope#block-2 talks about declarations whose target scope is the block scope of S, while https://eel.is/c++draft/basic.scope#scope-2.10 says that extern block-scope declarations target larger scope but bind a name in the immediate scope.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-30 18:28 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-04-12 21:36 [Bug c++/52953] New: g++-4.7.0 fails to detect function parameter name redeclarations meng at g dot clemson.edu 2012-04-12 21:53 ` [Bug c++/52953] " meng at g dot clemson.edu 2012-04-17 18:24 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2021-08-26 23:40 ` [Bug c++/52953] function parameter name redeclarations not detected pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-27 18:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-30 18:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-30 18:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-09-05 15:30 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-09-05 15:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-09-05 15:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-09-06 6:18 ` gayathri.gottumukkala.27 at gmail dot com 2023-09-06 13:44 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-52953-4-AXgc1Dw620@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).