public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/52980] New: [4.8 Regression] Many benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build
@ 2012-04-13 17:56 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2012-04-13 18:09 ` [Bug middle-end/52980] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2012-04-13 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52980

             Bug #: 52980
           Summary: [4.8 Regression] Many benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2000
                    failed to build
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.8.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: hjl.tools@gmail.com
                CC: areg.melikadamyan@gmail.com


On Linux/x86-64, revision 186419 failed to build many benchmarks:

Error with make 'specmake -j `/usr/bin/getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN` build >
make.out 2> make.err': check file
'/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-spec/spec/2000/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CINT2000/252.eon/run/00000001/make.err'

ggOakSolidTexture.cc: In member function 'virtual ggBoolean
ggOakSolidTexture::getTexture(const ggPoint3&, ggSpectrum&, double&) const':
ggOakSolidTexture.cc:33:11: internal compiler error: gimple check: expected
gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_assign_rhs1, at
gimple.h:1850
 ggBoolean ggOakSolidTexture::getTexture(const ggPoint3& p,
           ^
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
specmake[3]: *** [ggOakSolidTexture.o] Error 1
specmake[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

Error with make 'specmake -j `/usr/bin/getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN` build >
make.out 2> make.err': check file
'/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-spec/spec/2000/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CFP2000/188.ammp/run/00000001/make.err'

angle.c: In function 'v_mmangle':
angle.c:321:5: error: definition in block 8 follows the use
 int v_mmangle( V, lambda )
     ^
for SSA_NAME: reassocpow.66_113 in statement:
D.5306_80 = reassocpow.66_113 * D.5304_78;
angle.c:321:5: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
 int v_mmangle( V, lambda )
     ^
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
specmake[3]: *** [angle.o] Error 1

Error with make 'specmake -j `/usr/bin/getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN` build >
make.out 2> make.err': check file
'/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-spec/spec/2000/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CFP2000/200.sixtrack/run/00000001/make.err'

foxys.f: In function 'dafunt':
foxys.f:4119:0: internal compiler error: gimple check: expected
gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_assign_rhs1, at
gimple.h:1850
       SUBROUTINE DAFUNT(CF,INA,INC)
 ^
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
specmake[3]: *** [foxys.o] Error 1
specmake[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

Error with make 'specmake -j `/usr/bin/getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN` build >
make.out 2> make.err': check file
'/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-spec/spec/2000/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CFP2000/301.apsi/run/00000001/make.err'

apsi.f: In function 'ucrank':
apsi.f:2795:0: error: definition in block 5 follows the use
       SUBROUTINE UCRANK(DKS,HVAR,HELP,HELPA,NS,DELTAT,DELS,DZ,W,FORCN,
 ^
for SSA_NAME: reassocpow.2478_41 in statement:
D.17727_28 = reassocpow.2478_41 * frst_11;
apsi.f:2795:0: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
       SUBROUTINE UCRANK(DKS,HVAR,HELP,HELPA,NS,DELTAT,DELS,DZ,W,FORCN,
 ^
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
specmake[3]: *** [apsi.o] Error 1


Error with make 'specmake -j `/usr/bin/getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN` build >
make.out 2> make.err': check file
'/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-spec/spec/2000/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CINT2000/252.eon/run/00000002/make.err'

ggOakSolidTexture.cc: In member function 'virtual ggBoolean
ggOakSolidTexture::getTexture(const ggPoint3&, ggSpectrum&, double&) const':
ggOakSolidTexture.cc:33:11: internal compiler error: gimple check: expected
gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_assign_rhs1, at
gimple.h:1850
 ggBoolean ggOakSolidTexture::getTexture(const ggPoint3& p,
           ^
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
specmake[3]: *** [ggOakSolidTexture.o] Error 1
specmake[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

Error with make 'specmake -j `/usr/bin/getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN` build >
make.out 2> make.err': check file
'/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-spec/spec/2000/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CFP2000/188.ammp/run/00000002/make.err'

angle.c: In function 'v_mmangle':
angle.c:321:5: error: definition in block 8 follows the use
 int v_mmangle( V, lambda )
     ^
for SSA_NAME: reassocpow.84_113 in statement:
D.5306_80 = reassocpow.84_113 * D.5304_78;
angle.c:321:5: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
 int v_mmangle( V, lambda )
     ^
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
specmake[3]: *** [angle.o] Error 1

Error with make 'specmake -j `/usr/bin/getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN` build >
make.out 2> make.err': check file
'/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-spec/spec/2000/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CFP2000/200.sixtrack/run/00000002/make.err'

foxys.f: In function 'dafunt':
foxys.f:4119:0: internal compiler error: gimple check: expected
gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_assign_rhs1, at
gimple.h:1850
       SUBROUTINE DAFUNT(CF,INA,INC)
 ^
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
specmake[3]: *** [foxys.o] Error 1
specmake[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

Error with make 'specmake -j `/usr/bin/getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN` build >
make.out 2> make.err': check file
'/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-spec/spec/2000/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CFP2000/301.apsi/run/00000002/make.err'

apsi.f: In function 'ucrank':
apsi.f:2795:0: error: definition in block 5 follows the use
       SUBROUTINE UCRANK(DKS,HVAR,HELP,HELPA,NS,DELTAT,DELS,DZ,W,FORCN,
 ^
for SSA_NAME: reassocpow.3104_41 in statement:
D.17727_28 = reassocpow.3104_41 * frst_11;
apsi.f:2795:0: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
       SUBROUTINE UCRANK(DKS,HVAR,HELP,HELPA,NS,DELTAT,DELS,DZ,W,FORCN,
 ^
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
specmake[3]: *** [apsi.o] Error 1

Revision 186371 is OK.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/52980] [4.8 Regression] Many benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build
  2012-04-13 17:56 [Bug middle-end/52980] New: [4.8 Regression] Many benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2012-04-13 18:09 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2012-04-13 22:47 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2012-04-13 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52980

--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-04-13 18:09:16 UTC ---
It looks like a duplicate of pr52976.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/52980] [4.8 Regression] Many benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build
  2012-04-13 17:56 [Bug middle-end/52980] New: [4.8 Regression] Many benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2012-04-13 18:09 ` [Bug middle-end/52980] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2012-04-13 22:47 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-04-13 23:04 ` [Bug middle-end/52980] [4.8 Regression] Many benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2000/2006 " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-13 22:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52980

William J. Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-04-13
                 CC|                            |bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |gnu.org                     |
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from William J. Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-13 22:46:27 UTC ---
Not a (complete) duplicate.  The proposed fix for 52976 does take care of the
252.eon failures, but 188.ammp, 200.sixtract, and 301.apsi have some other
problem.  Investigating.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/52980] [4.8 Regression] Many benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2000/2006 failed to build
  2012-04-13 17:56 [Bug middle-end/52980] New: [4.8 Regression] Many benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2012-04-13 18:09 ` [Bug middle-end/52980] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2012-04-13 22:47 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-04-13 23:04 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2012-04-14  0:08 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-04-14 15:12 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2012-04-13 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52980

H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[4.8 Regression] Many       |[4.8 Regression] Many
                   |benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2000 |benchmarks in SPEC CPU
                   |failed to build             |2000/2006 failed to build

--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2012-04-13 23:03:18 UTC ---
Many benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2006 also failed to build with
similar error messages:

416.gamess
435.gromacs
453.povray
454.calculix
465.tonto
481.wrf


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/52980] [4.8 Regression] Many benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2000/2006 failed to build
  2012-04-13 17:56 [Bug middle-end/52980] New: [4.8 Regression] Many benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-04-13 23:04 ` [Bug middle-end/52980] [4.8 Regression] Many benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2000/2006 " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2012-04-14  0:08 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-04-14 15:12 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-14  0:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52980

--- Comment #4 from William J. Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-14 00:07:11 UTC ---
I've found that the cpu2006 failures are fixed by the patch in PR52976.  I have
to leave for an obligation tonight, but will investigate the remaining failures
in these two issues tomorrow -- they all have the same symptom, so hopefully
only one remaining problem.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/52980] [4.8 Regression] Many benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2000/2006 failed to build
  2012-04-13 17:56 [Bug middle-end/52980] New: [4.8 Regression] Many benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-04-14  0:08 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-04-14 15:12 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-14 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52980

William J. Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-14 15:11:43 UTC ---
After further investigation, I'm indeed marking this as a duplicate of PR52976.
 Further information on fixes may be found there.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 52976 ***


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-14 15:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-04-13 17:56 [Bug middle-end/52980] New: [4.8 Regression] Many benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-04-13 18:09 ` [Bug middle-end/52980] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-04-13 22:47 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-13 23:04 ` [Bug middle-end/52980] [4.8 Regression] Many benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2000/2006 " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2012-04-14  0:08 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-14 15:12 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).