From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27104 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2012 12:11:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 27095 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Apr 2012 12:11:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:11:38 +0000 From: "aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/52983] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3243 Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:11:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed AssignedTo Ever Confirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg02609.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52983 Alexandre Oliva changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed| |2012-04-30 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-04-30 12:11:08 UTC --- Mine. 1. I have vague recollections of insns that set apparently-dead hw regs remaining and being relevant for debug stuff, but I no longer remember the details, and I'm not sure it had to do with the code at hand anyway, or whether it justifies the current difference. I'll have to look into that. 2. Yeah, we ought to cleanup_auto_inc_dec the debug expr. I'll attach the patch I'm testing momentarily.