From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1001 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2015 09:08:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 932 invoked by uid 48); 14 Jul 2015 09:08:49 -0000 From: "ossman at cendio dot se" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/52991] attribute packed broken on mingw32? Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:08:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: major X-Bugzilla-Who: ossman at cendio dot se X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg01104.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991 Pierre Ossman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ossman at cendio dot se --- Comment #19 from Pierre Ossman --- This bug report is now over three years old. Any progress? I'm still seeing it in 5.1.0. Should the summary also be updated to reflect that this is a regression? And should the default be reverted until the code can be fixed?