From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-403277-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12104 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2012 10:43:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 11399 invoked by uid 48); 10 Oct 2012 10:43:28 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/53000] Conditional operator does not behave as standardized
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-53000-4-brPK32SJAr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-53000-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-53000-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00953.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53000

--- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-10-10 10:43:22 UTC ---
Why you believe it should "derive" from decay? It doesn't in C++11 and it
doesn't in the proposed resolution of LWG 2141.

Anyway, if you think there is something seriously wrong ;) with Daniel's work,
please comment on the patch as posted on mailing list, CC Daniel of course,
this PR per se is about the C++ front-end issue.