public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/53040] New: nested functions may trash floating point registers
@ 2012-04-19 11:11 amodra at gmail dot com
2012-04-19 15:32 ` [Bug target/53040] " amodra at gmail dot com
` (9 more replies)
0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: amodra at gmail dot com @ 2012-04-19 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53040
Bug #: 53040
Summary: nested functions may trash floating point registers
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: amodra@gmail.com
compile with -m32 -Os -fno-inline
void ws_f (void)
{
char b[10];
void ns_f (void)
{
char a[33];
__asm __volatile ("#%0 %1" : "=m" (a), "=m" (b) : : "fr28", "fr31");
}
ns_f ();
}
results in
ns_f.2345:
stwu 1,-96(1)
mflr 0
stfd 28,64(1)
stw 0,100(1)
stfd 31,88(1)
[snip]
addi 11,1,96
b _restfpr_28_x
_restfpr_28_x will restore fr29 and fr30 from uninitialised stack.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/53040] nested functions may trash floating point registers
2012-04-19 11:11 [Bug target/53040] New: nested functions may trash floating point registers amodra at gmail dot com
@ 2012-04-19 15:32 ` amodra at gmail dot com
2012-04-19 15:40 ` amodra at gmail dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: amodra at gmail dot com @ 2012-04-19 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53040
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> 2012-04-19 15:24:30 UTC ---
Created attachment 27191
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27191
obvious fix
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/53040] nested functions may trash floating point registers
2012-04-19 11:11 [Bug target/53040] New: nested functions may trash floating point registers amodra at gmail dot com
2012-04-19 15:32 ` [Bug target/53040] " amodra at gmail dot com
@ 2012-04-19 15:40 ` amodra at gmail dot com
2012-04-20 9:34 ` amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: amodra at gmail dot com @ 2012-04-19 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53040
Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2012-04-19
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/53040] nested functions may trash floating point registers
2012-04-19 11:11 [Bug target/53040] New: nested functions may trash floating point registers amodra at gmail dot com
2012-04-19 15:32 ` [Bug target/53040] " amodra at gmail dot com
2012-04-19 15:40 ` amodra at gmail dot com
@ 2012-04-20 9:34 ` amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-06 2:40 ` amodra at gmail dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: amodra at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-20 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53040
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra <amodra at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-20 09:33:23 UTC ---
Author: amodra
Date: Fri Apr 20 09:33:19 2012
New Revision: 186616
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186616
Log:
PR target/53040
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_savres_strategy): When using
static chain, set REST_INLINE_FPRS too.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/53040] nested functions may trash floating point registers
2012-04-19 11:11 [Bug target/53040] New: nested functions may trash floating point registers amodra at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-04-20 9:34 ` amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-02-06 2:40 ` amodra at gmail dot com
2013-02-06 2:47 ` amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: amodra at gmail dot com @ 2013-02-06 2:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53040
Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> 2013-02-06 02:39:54 UTC ---
Fixed. Not a regression so not applying to FSF branches.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/53040] nested functions may trash floating point registers
2012-04-19 11:11 [Bug target/53040] New: nested functions may trash floating point registers amodra at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-06 2:40 ` amodra at gmail dot com
@ 2013-02-06 2:47 ` amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-06 11:50 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: amodra at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-02-06 2:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53040
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra <amodra at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-06 02:46:24 UTC ---
Author: amodra
Date: Wed Feb 6 02:46:13 2013
New Revision: 195778
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195778
Log:
PR target/53040
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_savres_strategy): When using
static chain, set REST_INLINE_FPRS too.
Modified:
branches/ibm/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/ChangeLog.ibm
branches/ibm/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/53040] nested functions may trash floating point registers
2012-04-19 11:11 [Bug target/53040] New: nested functions may trash floating point registers amodra at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-06 2:47 ` amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-02-06 11:50 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-06 13:32 ` amodra at gmail dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-02-06 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53040
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot
| |gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-06 11:49:59 UTC ---
Can you reconsider? If that's an obvious fix for an annoying target problem,
then it should be put at least on the 4.7 branch. There are plenty of
precedents for other targets (x86, SPARC, ARM, etc).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/53040] nested functions may trash floating point registers
2012-04-19 11:11 [Bug target/53040] New: nested functions may trash floating point registers amodra at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-06 11:50 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-02-06 13:32 ` amodra at gmail dot com
2013-02-06 16:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: amodra at gmail dot com @ 2013-02-06 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53040
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> 2013-02-06 13:31:45 UTC ---
This one is hardly an annoying bug. You need
a) nested functions,
b) using floating point,
c) with an unusual set of callee saved fprs,
d) and -Os.
I found the bug only because I wrote a fairly complete test for
prologue/epilogue code.
OTOH, the patch is quite obvious and completely safe..
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/53040] nested functions may trash floating point registers
2012-04-19 11:11 [Bug target/53040] New: nested functions may trash floating point registers amodra at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-06 13:32 ` amodra at gmail dot com
@ 2013-02-06 16:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-06 22:26 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-07 1:40 ` amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-02-06 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53040
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-06 16:45:44 UTC ---
> This one is hardly an annoying bug. You need
> a) nested functions,
> b) using floating point,
> c) with an unusual set of callee saved fprs,
> d) and -Os.
a) + b) + d) is pretty much standard e.g. for embedded Ada on PowerPC/VxWorks.
> OTOH, the patch is quite obvious and completely safe..
Then I think it's a good candidate for a backport onto the 4.7 branch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/53040] nested functions may trash floating point registers
2012-04-19 11:11 [Bug target/53040] New: nested functions may trash floating point registers amodra at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-06 16:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-02-06 22:26 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-07 1:40 ` amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-02-06 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53040
David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-06 22:25:21 UTC ---
Go ahead and backport it to 4.7 branch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/53040] nested functions may trash floating point registers
2012-04-19 11:11 [Bug target/53040] New: nested functions may trash floating point registers amodra at gmail dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-06 22:26 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-02-07 1:40 ` amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: amodra at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-02-07 1:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53040
--- Comment #9 from Alan Modra <amodra at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-07 01:39:29 UTC ---
Author: amodra
Date: Thu Feb 7 01:39:21 2013
New Revision: 195834
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195834
Log:
PR target/53040
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_savres_strategy): When using
static chain, set REST_INLINE_FPRS too.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-07 1:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-04-19 11:11 [Bug target/53040] New: nested functions may trash floating point registers amodra at gmail dot com
2012-04-19 15:32 ` [Bug target/53040] " amodra at gmail dot com
2012-04-19 15:40 ` amodra at gmail dot com
2012-04-20 9:34 ` amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-06 2:40 ` amodra at gmail dot com
2013-02-06 2:47 ` amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-06 11:50 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-06 13:32 ` amodra at gmail dot com
2013-02-06 16:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-06 22:26 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-07 1:40 ` amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).