From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25097 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2014 14:54:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25077 invoked by uid 48); 8 Feb 2014 14:54:06 -0000 From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/53077] replace "Illegal preprocessor directive" message with "Ignoring preprocessor directive at %C. Use -cpp to enable the C preprocessor" (a patch by Tobias included) Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 14:54:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00801.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53077 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed| |2014-02-08 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Is there any objection if I do the testing and packaging for the patch in comment 4?