public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/53106] [4.8 Regression] Benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:12:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-53106-4-TgyBhjX2Ch@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-53106-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53106 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-25 16:11:43 UTC --- This is previously latent bug in frequency verification. We check that frequencies of edges match frequencies of basic block. This check is disabled when function is inline, because then the frequencies of edges are scaled to the same base as in the outer function. Now what happens is that the function gets cloned, then the original version gets fully inlined and finally becomes unreachable. We however need to keep function body around and thus remove_unreachable_nodes turns the inline clone back to offline re-enabling the check that finally fires. I am not sure how we got around this problem previously. I am doiuble checking.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-25 16:12 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-04-24 21:49 [Bug middle-end/53106] New: " hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-04-24 21:50 ` [Bug middle-end/53106] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-04-24 23:13 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-04-24 23:13 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-04-25 11:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-25 14:35 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-25 14:39 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-04-25 16:12 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2012-04-25 16:22 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03 15:17 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03 19:19 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-07 11:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-53106-4-TgyBhjX2Ch@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).