From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 992 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2012 02:25:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 981 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Apr 2012 02:25:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,SUBJ_OBFU_PUNCT_FEW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:25:42 +0000 From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/53156] New: [4.8 Regression]: gcc.target/cris/peep2-andu2.c Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:25:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hp at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg02536.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53156 Bug #: 53156 Summary: [4.8 Regression]: gcc.target/cris/peep2-andu2.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: hp@gcc.gnu.org Host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Target: cris-axis-elf This test previously passed, now it fails as follows. The observed regression was exposed by a commit in the range (before:after) 186859:186871, most likely the reload-commit in r186861. The fault is with the test-case: it has an assumption that a set of specific insn sequences is generated implying that those are the only minimal sequences, an assumption proven wrong. For one sequence change, there's a minor regression. Running /tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/cris/cris.exp ... FAIL: gcc.target/cris/peep2-andu2.c scan-assembler movu.w \\$r10,\\$ FAIL: gcc.target/cris/peep2-andu2.c scan-assembler and.w 2047,\\$ FAIL: gcc.target/cris/peep2-andu2.c scan-assembler movu.b \\$r10,\\$ FAIL: gcc.target/cris/peep2-andu2.c scan-assembler and.b 95,\\$ FAIL: gcc.target/cris/peep2-andu2.c scan-assembler andq -2,\\$