From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13470 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2012 04:42:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 13462 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Apr 2012 04:42:27 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 04:42:15 +0000 From: "zeratul976 at hotmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/53158] New: [C++11] Bogus error in loop condition Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 04:42:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: zeratul976 at hotmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg02540.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53158 Bug #: 53158 Summary: [C++11] Bogus error in loop condition Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: zeratul976@hotmail.com For the following code: int main() { auto a = []() { return true; }; auto b = []() { return a(); }; int c, d; while (b() && c < d) { } } GCC produces the following errors: test.cpp: In lambda function: test.cpp:4:28: error: 'a' is not captured auto b = []() { return a(); }; ^ test.cpp: In function 'int main()': test.cpp:6:23: error: invalid operands of types 'void' and 'int' to binary 'operator!=' while (b() && c < d) ^ The first error is correct, and fixing it makes both errors go away. However, the second error is bogus: operator!= is not being called anywhere.