public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug bootstrap/53188] New: libatomic error: Please use exactly Autoconf 2.64 instead of 2.69
@ 2012-05-02  9:11 pluto at agmk dot net
  2012-05-02 11:27 ` [Bug bootstrap/53188] [4.8 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pluto at agmk dot net @ 2012-05-02  9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53188

             Bug #: 53188
           Summary: libatomic error: Please use exactly Autoconf 2.64
                    instead of 2.69
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.8.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: bootstrap
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: pluto@agmk.net


fresh autobuild fails with:

(...)
make[2]: Entering directory
`/home/users/pluto/src/gcc.builddir/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libatomic'
CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd /home/users/pluto/src/gcc.git/libatomic &&
/bin/sh /home/users/pluto/src/gcc.git/missing --run aclocal-1.11 -I .. -I
../config
configure.ac:26: error: Please use exactly Autoconf 2.64 instead of 2.69.
../config/override.m4:12: _GCC_AUTOCONF_VERSION_CHECK is expanded from...
configure.ac:26: the top level
autom4te: m4 failed with exit status: 1
aclocal-1.11: autom4te failed with exit status: 1
make[2]: *** [/home/users/pluto/src/gcc.git/libatomic/aclocal.m4] Error 1


6db1d2ca83f9327020b75f6c1610649bb18e71db is the first bad commit

commit 6db1d2ca83f9327020b75f6c1610649bb18e71db
Author: rth <rth@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date:   Tue May 1 15:48:28 2012 +0000

    Add libatomic as a target library.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/53188] [4.8 Regression] libatomic error: Please use exactly Autoconf 2.64 instead of 2.69
  2012-05-02  9:11 [Bug bootstrap/53188] New: libatomic error: Please use exactly Autoconf 2.64 instead of 2.69 pluto at agmk dot net
@ 2012-05-02 11:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-05-02 13:17 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-05-02 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53188

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-05-02
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.8.0
            Summary|libatomic error: Please use |[4.8 Regression] libatomic
                   |exactly Autoconf 2.64       |error: Please use exactly
                   |instead of 2.69             |Autoconf 2.64 instead of
                   |                            |2.69
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-02 11:26:55 UTC ---
Confirmed.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/53188] [4.8 Regression] libatomic error: Please use exactly Autoconf 2.64 instead of 2.69
  2012-05-02  9:11 [Bug bootstrap/53188] New: libatomic error: Please use exactly Autoconf 2.64 instead of 2.69 pluto at agmk dot net
  2012-05-02 11:27 ` [Bug bootstrap/53188] [4.8 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-05-02 13:17 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-05-02 16:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-05-02 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53188

Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-02 13:17:26 UTC ---
Um, denied.

./contrib/gcc_update for svn trees,
./contrib/gcc_update --touch for reflections into other rcs.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/53188] [4.8 Regression] libatomic error: Please use exactly Autoconf 2.64 instead of 2.69
  2012-05-02  9:11 [Bug bootstrap/53188] New: libatomic error: Please use exactly Autoconf 2.64 instead of 2.69 pluto at agmk dot net
  2012-05-02 11:27 ` [Bug bootstrap/53188] [4.8 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-05-02 13:17 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-05-02 16:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-05-02 22:14 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-05-23  6:55 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-05-02 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53188

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-02 16:56:09 UTC ---
>./contrib/gcc_update for svn trees,

it also works correctly for git trees too.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/53188] [4.8 Regression] libatomic error: Please use exactly Autoconf 2.64 instead of 2.69
  2012-05-02  9:11 [Bug bootstrap/53188] New: libatomic error: Please use exactly Autoconf 2.64 instead of 2.69 pluto at agmk dot net
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-05-02 16:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-05-02 22:14 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-05-23  6:55 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-05-02 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53188

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-02 22:13:06 UTC ---
Something odd's happening, after a git pull and running make in my build dir I
find the source has changed (I didn't do it)

diff --git a/libatomic/Makefile.in b/libatomic/Makefile.in
index 470f83b..a016cdf 100644
--- a/libatomic/Makefile.in
+++ b/libatomic/Makefile.in
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ DIST_COMMON = $(am__configure_deps) $(srcdir)/../config.guess
\
        $(srcdir)/../install-sh $(srcdir)/../ltmain.sh \
        $(srcdir)/../missing $(srcdir)/../mkinstalldirs \
        $(srcdir)/Makefile.am $(srcdir)/Makefile.in \
-       $(srcdir)/auto-config.h.in $(top_srcdir)/configure
+       $(srcdir)/auto-config.h.in $(top_srcdir)/configure ChangeLog
 ACLOCAL_M4 = $(top_srcdir)/aclocal.m4
 am__aclocal_m4_deps = $(top_srcdir)/../config/acx.m4 \
        $(top_srcdir)/../config/depstand.m4 \


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/53188] [4.8 Regression] libatomic error: Please use exactly Autoconf 2.64 instead of 2.69
  2012-05-02  9:11 [Bug bootstrap/53188] New: libatomic error: Please use exactly Autoconf 2.64 instead of 2.69 pluto at agmk dot net
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-05-02 22:14 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-05-23  6:55 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-05-23  6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53188

Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hp at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-23 03:28:08 UTC ---
JFTR.

(In reply to comment #4)
> Something odd's happening, after a git pull and running make in my build dir

Without using "./contrib/gcc_update --touch" this mess up relative file
modification times, causing autotools to run to update e.g. Makefile.in.

> I
> find the source has changed (I didn't do it)

> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ DIST_COMMON = $(am__configure_deps) $(srcdir)/../config.guess

> -       $(srcdir)/auto-config.h.in $(top_srcdir)/configure
> +       $(srcdir)/auto-config.h.in $(top_srcdir)/configure ChangeLog

I recognize that as an autoconf "feature", seen elsewhere.
Maybe just let it have its way?
After all the ChangeLog files are part of a disted tarball.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-05-23  3:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-05-02  9:11 [Bug bootstrap/53188] New: libatomic error: Please use exactly Autoconf 2.64 instead of 2.69 pluto at agmk dot net
2012-05-02 11:27 ` [Bug bootstrap/53188] [4.8 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-02 13:17 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-02 16:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-02 22:14 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-23  6:55 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).