From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C77653858C62; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:18:06 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C77653858C62 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1710623886; bh=eUgSGkndLnTkThZCEB0U7pjfblOxQGUHIQFmznpSxWY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XWUBbFUF4cJKpMYwxqEuFBaTiOL4ZeO8nwvx9O4YqhtROL3GdwVMjn543usVcuZQ8 6b+/MMGNApfkr9HG75teTcA2zcojdT6BPVIKazruRQa2GJyOYkv4ra60YXNqVL3kmw Mljp8QYWutkMv7UcwU5IKcpw5jpennEs3/nXxyvM= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug preprocessor/53212] cpp consumes comment after pragma Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:18:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: preprocessor X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D53212 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Hmm, clang has the same behavior here ... I don't know if it is the right one though.=