From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-394655-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 377 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2012 01:59:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 32677 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jun 2012 01:59:32 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 01:59:18 +0000
From: "ppluzhnikov at google dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/53220] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ mis-compiles compound literals
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 01:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ppluzhnikov at google dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.1
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-53220-4-7Y9anT5JyO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-53220-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-53220-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg01282.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D53220

--- Comment #18 from Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov at google dot com> 2012-0=
6-20 01:59:01 UTC ---
FWIW, it appears that the new error is too strict. It rejects this source,
which (AFAIU) is entirely kosher:

#include <stdio.h>

void fn(int arr[])
{
  for (int j =3D 0; j < 5; ++j)
    printf("%d: %d\n", j, arr[j]);
}

int main()
{
  fn((int[]) { 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 } );
  return 0;
}

g++ -c t.cc
t.cc: In function =E2=80=98int main()=E2=80=99:
t.cc:11:37: error: taking address of temporary array
   fn((int[]) { 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 } );
                                     ^

Still, I prefer to rewrite the case above, then to debug undiagnosed runtime
problems from the original test case.