From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2B4E13858D20; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 04:43:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2B4E13858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1710650592;
	bh=mzXYSFMa5/IHqfKu0QHfaZKvqg4BkhlwpuarLNCy09o=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Y5mcKrZYAHp3mI9o1Tlb7ldIw1pQnf0QqRTmQ2hoLHoAmRmYPaNvW74soJzOcVpFa
	 YFdXehKr2SUYhUh9W9A40dRD47JQ7vdh25zEleg8Pzeglk/K77fW9NY+533K69nXna
	 8kWaYnq3jxh/q5QA85EbBsT8PiR9hCvShYQPPUv4=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/53273] test-cases suffer from cross-function
 optimizations with no way to mark limits
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 04:43:10 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-53273-4-mv7L0tp3TI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-53273-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-53273-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D53273

--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #8)
> There it is!  I *knew* I had a PR entered for this, and was a bit surpris=
ed
> when the ipa attribute was introduced, that this PR wasn't cross-referenc=
ed.
>=20
> Then again I guess most people don't check in bugzilla for possible entri=
es
> when they fix something, and this one maybe hasn't got any good terms to
> look for.

I think part of it is also finding it independently and fixing it without
looking to see if someone has filed a bug report. I have found a few like t=
his
over the last few years as I try to clean up bugzilla for quality reports.=