From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21875 invoked by alias); 16 May 2012 02:12:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 21787 invoked by uid 22791); 16 May 2012 02:12:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 May 2012 02:12:35 +0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/53339] unordered_map::iterator requires Value to be complete type Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 02:14:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg01586.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-16 02:12:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) > I was hoping to avoid copyright assignment by having someone else > do the work :) That's OK, but in that case I think (and this is just IMHO) it's better if you don't post a series of patches. Ideally we'd like you to sign a copyright assignment and contribute, but if you won't or can't contribute your code then IMHO you shouldn't offer it in the form of patches, because if we can't accept it then even reviewing your patch might make it tricky for us to implement the suggestion in a similar way (did we use your code? copy your idea? do we need to get a lawyer to decide if a change we make is based on your non-assigned work? ... I don't want to have to even ask those questions, let alone answer them!)