From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-391788-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31390 invoked by alias); 14 May 2012 10:16:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 31380 invoked by uid 22791); 14 May 2012 10:16:13 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 May 2012 10:15:58 +0000
From: "mh+gcc at glandium dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/53341] New: overloaded operator delete(void *) appear in object file even when not directly used
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 10:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mh+gcc at glandium dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-53341-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg01406.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53341

             Bug #: 53341
           Summary: overloaded operator delete(void *) appear in object
                    file even when not directly used
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: mh+gcc@glandium.org


Consider the following program:

---------8<----------
#include <algorithm>
extern void moz_free(void *ptr);

__attribute__((always_inline)) inline
void operator delete(void* ptr) throw()
{
    return moz_free(ptr);
}

int foo() {
    return 42;
}
---------8<----------

g++ -std=c++0x will put two symbols in the resulting object:
_ZdlPv and _Z3foov. The former is operator delete(void *)

This doesn't happen when including <new> instead of <algorithm>.

This doesn't happen without -std=c++0x.

This doesn't happen with operator new, operator new[], or operator delete[].

This doesn't happen when removing __attribute__((__externally_visible__)) from
/usr/include/c++/4.7/new. (added in bug 50594)