From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-392172-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8024 invoked by alias); 18 May 2012 11:49:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 8009 invoked by uid 22791); 18 May 2012 11:49:14 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 May 2012 11:49:00 +0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/53346] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Bad vectorization in the proc cptrf2 of rnflow.f90
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 11:49:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status AssignedTo
Message-ID: <bug-53346-4-8YMtlOJpZz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-53346-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-53346-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg01790.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53346

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |gnu.org                     |

--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-18 11:02:53 UTC ---
Yeah, this is sort-of related to what is observed in PR53355.  I suppose at
runtime nxtr is comparatively small.

Reduced testcase:

      subroutine cptrf2 (nxtr, ixtrt)
      integer, dimension (1:nxtr), intent (out) :: ixtrt
      ixtrt = 0
      end subroutine

we peel the loop to possibly align the stores, and we peel the loop
to possibly take care of a remaining store at the end of the array.
And of course we compute that we need at least 6 scalar iterations
to make executing the vectorized loop profitable.

And apart from all that we should have recognized the loop as memset.

Mine.