From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28823 invoked by alias); 31 Dec 2012 09:20:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 28614 invoked by uid 48); 31 Dec 2012 09:19:55 -0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/53346] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Bad if conversion in cptrf2 of rnflow.f90 Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:20:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg02444.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53346 --- Comment #23 from Andrew Pinski 2012-12-31 09:19:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) If the patch referenced in comment #22 fixes this bug, then it is a dup of bug 54073. Can someone confirm if this has been fixed on the trunk now?