From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10212 invoked by alias); 15 May 2012 17:35:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 10041 invoked by uid 22791); 15 May 2012 17:35:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 May 2012 17:35:41 +0000 From: "skunk at iskunk dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/53348] Conflicting fast-integer types on AIX: vs. gcc/config/rs6000/aix-stdint.h Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 17:41:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: skunk at iskunk dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg01559.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53348 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Richard G. 2012-05-15 17:35:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > AIX 4.3.2 was announced in 1998 and end of service in 2003. The AIX header is > wrong and was fixed in later versions. You have a work-around. I am not aware > of anyone else trying to use recent versions of GCC on ancient versions of AIX. > Customers who continue to use an old version generally freeze all software on > the system. Patches are welcome. So if I understand correctly: GCC may still nominally support AIX 4.3, but no one here really wants to spend time dealing with it. If that's the case, could you set these PRs to WAITING/IN_PROGRESS, and assign them to me? I'll gladly try my hand at some patches, as long as someone here is willing to review them and get them in if they're good. I was under the impression that fast-integer types could be N bits or more in size, so e.g. "typedef int32_t int_fast16_t" would be valid (and may make sense for the architecture). So you're saying that's not it, and sys/inttypes.h needs fixincluding?