From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-392586-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7920 invoked by alias); 22 May 2012 14:39:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 7798 invoked by uid 22791); 22 May 2012 14:39:35 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 May 2012 14:39:16 +0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/53426] [4.8 Regression] ICE:create_variable_info_for  at ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.c:5581
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 14:40:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: lto
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-53426-4-hLMamP48xZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-53426-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-53426-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg02204.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53426

--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-22 13:52:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> OK,
> I see the following:
> 6882      FOR_EACH_VARIABLE (var)
> 6883        {
> 6884          if (var->alias)
> 6885            continue;
> 6886
> 6887          get_vi_for_tree (var->symbol.decl);
> 6888        }
> 
> (gdb) p dump_varpool_node (stderr, var)
> _ZTVN5boost16exception_detail19error_info_injectorISt13runtime_errorEE.local.230/1658
> (_ZTVN5boost16exception_detail19error_info_injectorISt13runtime_errorEE)
> @0x7ffff75f1e88
>   Type: variable
>   Visibility: in_other_partition used_from_other_partition
> prevailing_def_ironly external public visibility_specified visibility:hidden
> virtual artificial
>   References: 
>   Referring:
> _ZNK5boost16exception_detail10clone_implINS0_19error_info_injectorISt13runtime_errorEEE5cloneEv.local.151/2414
> (addr)_ZNK5boost16exception_detail10clone_implINS0_19error_info_injectorISt13runtime_errorEEE5cloneEv.local.151/2414
> (addr)
>   Availability: overwritable
>   Varpool flags: initialized finalized
> 
> this var won't pass varpool_all_refs_explicit: it is from other partition and
> used from elsewhere.
> 
> Partitioning should have put the variables referred by this constructor into a
> boundary and it is not doing it - I will fix that.
> (it gets that right at my internal symbol table tree)
> 
> On the other hand, is ipa-pta able to take advantage of fact that the variable
> is readonly? I would propose:
> Index: tree-ssa-structalias.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tree-ssa-structalias.c      (revision 187695)
> +++ tree-ssa-structalias.c      (working copy)
> @@ -5583,7 +5583,8 @@ create_variable_info_for (tree decl, con
> 
>           /* If this is a global variable with an initializer and we are in
>              IPA mode generate constraints for it.  */
> -         if (DECL_INITIAL (decl))
> +         if (DECL_INITIAL (decl)
> +             && vnode->analyzed)
>             {
>               VEC (ce_s, heap) *rhsc = NULL;
>               struct constraint_expr lhs, *rhsp;
> 
> I.e. to care only about constructors of vars from current partition.
> This function does not check varpool_all_refs_explicit as you suggested in
> previous comment.

Ok, this fixes it.  You explained DECL_INITIAL of a !vnode->analyzed can
never refer to a varpool_all_refs_explicit_p () decl.